Monday, November 17, 2014

Presentation - Las Vegas

Sustainability ideas for Las Vegas.


Areas in need of obvious improvement:


Transportation
Hunger
   Utilizing waste of hotels for homeless/hungry
   Education and  involvement in agriculture in school systems
Energy
Education
Water


Transportation/Bike Paths 


City of Las Vegas would implement safe (perhaps elevated or walled) bike paths along major foot traffic areas, such as the Strip and Downtown. Self- checkout Bike Stations would be available along the path where bikes could be rented by the hour or day with a credit/debit card or smart phone. Some bike options for children and trailers would be available, also. Each station would have a rent/return option or an option to securely store bikes while shopping/dining touring the hotels. Trained, paid bike patrol “guides” would ride the route to help with mechanical and safety issues, tourist questions, and all-around hospitality.  Initial costs would come from bond tax and hotel taxes, revenues would go to fund city parks and recreation, and enlarging the bike program to eventually include other recreational areas such as Red Rock Canyon, Mount Charleston. Lake Mead, Valley of Fire, and other bike baths for residents. 
This would cut down on fuel consumption and motor vehicle traffic, and increase healthful, family-oriented recreation on the Strip and Downtown.

Safety Idea: https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=10152036679734139&set=vb.17027909138&type=2&theaterHunger

Hotels and the Homeless

Implement an on-site gleaner program for each hotel. 

Serve homeless or hungry residents the extra from hotel restaurants on a daily basis (perhaps a soup kitchen type setup somewhere behind the strip, with resources there to talk to people about getting back on their feet, and training for culinary jobs), or at least arrange pick up of extra food from each hotel and take it to the homeless shelters. 
Incentive: Hotels would get tax credits for participating. 
Homeless/poor could be employed to do the gathering, preparation, and delivery of food, getting job skills, experience, and contacts for full time employment.

In Schools


Each public school would have a greenhouse. Starting in grade school, students would learn to plant and grow a garden, using the greens in the school lunch program. This would begin a lifelong education in healthy eating, growing organically, nutrition and commerce. Extra food would go to homeless shelters, to families of kids in need, or sold as a business.
Best practices would be taught, such as building for energy saving (earth berm greenhouses, solar panels, windmill water pumps, recycling garden water into fish tanks, composting lunch waste) Kids could also raise chickens for eggs, as an excellent source of protein, while letting them care for other living things and teaching them responsibility.
Students could actually spend after school hours doing something enjoyable and productive. Community members could volunteer for after-school supervision. Many older people have skills, such as canning foods for storage, that will be lost in a few decades if younger people are not taught in schools. The program could grow to include other animals, such as dairy and beef cows, goats and horses, pigs, and even raising bees, making soaps, cheeses, candles, selling honey, and pursuing money-making skills. 
This program would eventually pay for itself in terms of healthful living and employable skills, while building a real sense of community, and honoring and passing on the knowledge of elders.

Quick video on this idea in action: http://vimeo.com/91578576?from=outro-embed

Education

Eliminating GE requirements at UNLV for some degrees. 


Offer degrees at UNLV like they do in European Universities. Concentrating on majors, students could show a set degree of competence in general education, either by testing out or showing high school competency scores, thereby allowing skipping two years of generals and getting degrees faster, saving on loans and student debt, while attracting more enrollment, at faster turnover rates. 

On Retaining Excellent Teachers

Teachers would be required to maintain a level of excellence which would attract enrollment. Adjunct professors that show high promise would be encouraged to get their terminal degrees and continue on as teaching staff.  UNLV would offer full-ride scholarships to selected adjuncts that commit to teaching at UNLV for four years after graduate school.

Energy

Reduce energy consumption on hotel lights.



Solar panel cloth could be stretched over hotel roofs,  some walkways and bike paths, and large parking lots in Las Vegas, harvesting the abundant sunlight while shading pedestrians, bikes and cars, reducing interior air temperatures in locked, parked cars, which saves on air conditioning. The energy from this new technology of solar cloth could be put into a city wide grid, providing energy during peak hours to hotels and residential areas. Power for hotel lights would come out of the grid when houses are not using as much, reducing stress on the power grid and paying for the extravagant lighting Las Vegas is known for. There should also be designated down times, thereby encouraging some night sky viewing, without all the light pollution. Who really needs to see the Strip 100% lit up at 4am?
Tax credits could be a huge incentive for hotels to install this product, while selling excess energy to the city makes sense in order to get a reduced rate for energy when it is needed.



Bonus topic—Because talking about sustainability for Las Vegas and not mentioning water would be lax.

Water conservation:

Water Appreciation Day/April 1st

One day a year, all water to residential areas should be shut down. People should have to store/carry their own water for just one day, in order to create empathy with the people all over the world that have to haul their own water every day. Conservation would boom.

Landscaping:


ALL shallow evaporation ponds should be required to be maintained as wildlife refuge areas, or filled in and used for water-wise organic community gardening.

Thursday, November 13, 2014

NBA's (Attempt) at a Game Length Change: Contextual Analysis Final

Contextual Analysis 


Prior to the 2014-2015 NBA season, there was a ton of talk about changing the game length of an NBA game from 48 minutes, to 44 minutes (Palladino). In all fairness, this was just talk, but talk also means that one side had a legitimate argument for why they wanted this change. Therefore, it has potential. It's important to understand how social media plays a role in this issue, without it, it may not be such a big deal in the first place. With it, we receive responses from all types of people, one of those being; Michael Jordan.



Now, before we look at the social media aspect, lets first look at some of the issues against this proposal in the first place. Number one; the players. These guys are getting paid MILLIONS of dollars to go out and, figuratively speaking, put on a show. If you shorten the game length that these players have agreed to, then you must also shorten their pay because they are spending less time on the job. As you can imagine, the players would not be as in favor of that.

Second; the fans. We are paying hundreds of dollars to go watch this 'show'. We want our full two and a half hours in attendance to not be shortened one bit. The fans enjoy this game, and enjoy attending it. In perspective, if you shorten the MLB to 8 innings, you'll have a lot of upset people. Same thing with shortening the NBA, we want to see this game played just as it is.

And finally; finances. During broadcasts of this game, companies are advertising their products, commercials are playing, and all times of publicity is available inside and outside of the arena. Companies that have contracts with the organizations, or deals with the television networks, will be very upset because a shorter game, means less breaks. There are good things that may come out of it, such as players being fresher, stars being on the court throughout individual games for the larger part, and people with things to do having more time to do them. In the long run though, you'll have a lot of angry people on your hands if you choose to shorten this game.

Now, would this whole issue have been a deal 20 years ago before ease of interaction through our mobile phones, tablets, and laptops with the NBA rumors in the first place? It's a pretty obvious, no. That's why, this is such an interesting topic to analyze. Now, with twitter sharing the rumors instantly, and news articles being shared on Facebook, the people know and respond to the subject without any delay. We have players responding, ex-players responding, analysts responding to this idea and I think that had a huge impact on the NBA not implementing the shorter games this season.

This idea of social media also gives citizens the opportunity to respond and share their opinion on the matter, which, (besides the trollers) is actually very good. This makes it much easier for NBA management to decide if the idea will be taken well or not in our society. At the same time, it makes for many many mixed messages. The mixed messages come from citizens that take matters into their own hands and post official looking responses to the subject without any credibility. Then, people like you and me, see these second hand posts and we therefore may only get one side of the story. 

You can look at social media's impact positively or negatively. Before it, there wouldn't be this many people fighting against it, and a lot of angry fans wouldn't have their voices heard. That's whats so great about social media though, is that now our voices are heard. Now, the NBA (who has a Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram) heard the fans and decided against it for this season. The issue became such a big deal that even Lebron James came out and said,

It's not the minutes, it's the games. The minutes don't mean anything. We can play 50-minute games if we had to. It's the games that I think we all as players think is too many games in our season. 82 games are a lot. But it's not the minutes, taking away minutes from the game is not going to shorten the game at all. (Broussard)

Players, fans, and coaches alike took to social media to voice their opinions on the manner. This also saves a lot of time for the people deciding on the issue to go out and get opinions in the first place. Afterall, when you have Michael Jordan against it, you probably shouldn't do it. 


All in all, the NBA is a very successful business and is not broken at all, so don't try to fix anything. Atleast that's my take, here on social media. Who knows what will happen, all we can do, is let our voices be heard.

References:


Friday, November 7, 2014

I want the Freedom to be Free to know if the Freedom I have is really Free.

Edward Snowden is a patriot. Let's get that out of the way right now. He informed the American people about illegal practices the government was taking in order to keep a "closer eye" on us. That part is pretty simple, but, when it comes to the idea of freedom, I can see both points of view.

Personally, I have nothing to hide. I am an open book. My idea of freedom is being able to walk out your door at 2 A.M. and go to the grocery store. Rights like this, are not restricted, therefore, I feel free. If the government wants to see phone calls, what we browse on the internet, where we travel to, in order to keep our nation secure, I'm honestly  o.k. with that.

On the other hand, why am I being watched?? I haven't done anything to threaten my nations security, I'm not thinking of ways to do it right now, and I don't plan on terrorizing the U.S. in the future. So leave me alone! Either way, you're going to have supporters of both opinions. Thank you for what you did Edward Snowden, you truly are a patriot.